By Barry Miller
The sequel to From lifestyles to God, this article deals a portrait of God that contrasts sharply with that supplied through perfect-being theology. It exposes the absurdity of this view and exhibits how significantly God differs from even the main exalted of his creatures.
Read or Download A Most Unlikely God: A Philosophical Enquiry into the Nature of God PDF
Best theology books
E-book by way of Erigena, Johannes Scotus, Eriugena, Johannes S.
Questions of soreness and affliction take place often in medieval theological debate. the following, Dr Mowbray examines the cutting edge perspectives of Paris's masters of theology within the 13th century, illuminating how they built notions of discomfort and anguish via construction a customary terminology and conceptual framework.
The most important death-of-God theologian explores the that means and goal of radical theology.
In the decision to Radical Theology, Thomas J. J. Altizer meditates at the nature of radical theology and calls readers to adopt the vocation of radical theology as a fashion of dwelling an absolutely tested lifestyles. In fourteen essays, he explores how the loss of life of God in modernity and the dissolution of divine authority have freed theology to turn into a method of final mirrored image and inventive inquiry not certain by means of church sanction or doctrinal strictures.
Revealing a wealth of significant types for doing radical theological considering, Altizer discusses the paintings of philosophers similar to Hegel, Nietzsche, Heidegger, Marion, Derrida, and Levinas, between others. assets also are present in the paintings of ingenious writers, in particular Milton, Blake, and Joyce. within the spirit of Joyce’s the following Comes all people, Altizer is confident that theology is for everybody and that everybody has the authority to do theology authentically. An advent by way of Lissa McCullough and foreword via David E. Klemm support orient the reader to Altizer’s exact figuring out of the function of theology after the loss of life of God.
Is nature all there's? John Haught examines this question and in doing so addresses a primary factor within the discussion of technology with faith. the idea that nature is all there's and that no total goal exists within the universe is understood commonly as 'naturalism'. Naturalism, during this context, denies the life of any realities unique from the wildlife and human tradition.
- On Religious Diversity
- Cardinal Bessarion : mystical theology and spiritual union between East and West
- Radical Christian Voices and Practice: Essays in Honour of Christopher Rowland
- Incarnation and Physics: Natural Science in the Theology of Thomas F. Torrance
Additional info for A Most Unlikely God: A Philosophical Enquiry into the Nature of God
The suggestion that there is such a sense is in fact not without support, for it has sometimes been thought, and even thought to be self-evident, that Socrates could not have come to exist unless, prior to his existing, it was possible that he exist. Of course, since this is a de re claim, it could be true only if there were some res to which the possibility, potentiality, or capacity for existence could be ascribed. Since it would make no sense to ascribe a potentiality or capacity to Socrates, if there were no Socrates in any world to be a subject of that ascription, the de re claim could be true only if there were some sense in which, even before his conception, it could have been said that there was a Socrates who was merely able to become actual.
Summa Theologica, 1, 7, 2C). ' De Creaturis Spiritualibus, 1c). This would seem to indicate that the contraction of existence would be a consequence of its being received in Socrates. If that is a correct interpretation, it would differ from my view of Socrates as bounding his existence rather than as receiving it. I have been insisting that a bound is not to be confused with a container or recipient (if any) that might impose a bound. < previous page page_35 next page > < previous page page_36 next page > Page 36 vant to the product of that process, which is a portion of water and a portion of butter each distinct from all other individuals.
Hence, Socrates' existence could not inhere in him unless there were a sense in which he himself was real logically prior to his existence. The suggestion that there is such a sense is in fact not without support, for it has sometimes been thought, and even thought to be self-evident, that Socrates could not have come to exist unless, prior to his existing, it was possible that he exist. Of course, since this is a de re claim, it could be true only if there were some res to which the possibility, potentiality, or capacity for existence could be ascribed.
A Most Unlikely God: A Philosophical Enquiry into the Nature of God by Barry Miller